There is a crucial difference between SN and WM. According to SN, moral sentences have truth values. According to WM, they do not. This follows from the fact that according to WM, each moral sentence has two meaning components. One component is factual. It is the assertion that the speaker has a certain attitude. This part has a truth value. But the other component is a command. Commands are neither true nor false.
Sayfa 224 - the differences bw subjective naturalism ve stevenson's working modelKitabı okudu
for example, the sentence “Pain is bad” could not be used to assert anything. It could only be used expressively or imperativally. Consequently, it would seem that no one could Objections to know, or even believe, that pain is bad. For there simply is no such thing as the “fact” that pain is bad, according to radical emotivism. Thus, emotivism entails that there can be no “moral knowledge.” For this reason, emotivism is sometimes classified as a form of noncognitivism.
Sayfa 218 - kısaca radical emotivism:Kitabı okudu
moral judgments are closely associated with positive and negative feelings, or emotions.
Sayfa 212 - the definition of emotivismKitabı okudu
"Bazen benim de hayal kurabileceğimi kabul etmelisin."
"Ama hayalinde bana yer vermedin."
Keyifle güldü.
"Ben sana bütün hayallerimde yer veriyorum, Portuga. Tom Mix ve Fred Thompson'la yemyeşil geniş çayırlara doğru yola çıktığımda, fazla yorulmadan yolculuk edebilmen için sana bir posta arabası tuttum. Gittiğim bütün yerlerde sen de varsın. Zaman zaman, okulda kapıya bakıyorum ve senin görünüp bana günaydın diyeceğini düşünüyorum... "
" Tanrım! Hiç bu kadar sevgiye susamış bir küçük yürek görmedim... Ama biliyor musun, bana bu kadar bağlanman doğru değil. "
Sayfa 158 - canKitabı okudu
Moore’s main thesis in Principia Ethica is that goodness is an unanalyzable, nonnatural property. Put linguistically, this thesis is the view that “good” cannot be defined, and is not synonymous with any naturalistic expression.
Sayfa 203 - moore'un metaetiğiKitabı okudu