Gönderi
PROPOSAL FOR A NEW ATTITUDE TOWARD THE TECHNOLOGY
The book doesn’t answer how to integrate technology into society rather than problematises the attitude of mentality “techne” that causes humanitarian actualisation upon nature through using “techne o logic” embodiment, human-being exist indirectly,provocates separation, to let society be aware of their philosophical disruption based on natural thoughts to overcome it.
But how the economy is being overwhelmed by needs and encountered with “technology” and yet be adapted and created by causality; society would be able to heal themselves, too, to be aware of the fear that upon the nature of technology lies on domination, evolving; thinking of being pure order, the mechanistic vision that gives rise to the desire to rule under Darwinian thoughts. I mean there is no such thing as “be brought forth of the true into the beautiful” because the evolutional periods themself create beauty from themselves like technology in different purposes phenomenons, needs...
The book answers. When we move our perception through one of the wholeness concepts, organic wholenesses and imperfection, that are supported throughout chapters, from the pure order vision. It works with technology, the economy and society as well. Technology with its domains and subsystems behave like languages that have one huge grammar but if the visional paradigm changes, poems are created. It just looks like a way to integrate society and technology could be actualised by allowing people to live with the natural aspect of technology being transparent rather than indirectly solid. So, we would be able to trust rather than hope in technology beyond the nature of things. So, there are very many ways to sense but the more materialistic, biological and spiritualistic way is architecture embodied by the nature of technology behaving naturally such a messy vitality”
·
25 views
Yorum yapabilmeniz için giriş yapmanız gerekmektedir.