This text has been automatically translated from Turkish. Show Original
Film critic Tunca Arslan, in this book, lists 35 "bad" movies released between 1981 and 2008. It's about a Turkish movie. The author, who evaluates the films mostly in terms of script, character and logical errors, also included in the book the criticisms of other critics that appeared at the time of the films' release. The book has a sarcastic, humorous language. Even if they are bad, some movies arouse curiosity and make you want to watch them. It would be interesting to watch some of the films that I have watched and liked in the past, along with the opinions in this book, but I think it will not be possible to access the relevant films. The definition of good movie or bad movie may vary from person to person. There are very different perspectives on cinema as an art. For example, some care about the script, some care about the images, some care about the characters, and some care about the message of the film. Today "garbage" There are also many movies described as. Interestingly, "garbage" Some of the films described as can break box office records. Films that comply with the principles of cinema can only reach a few thousand viewers. Perhaps what is important here is the purpose for which the film is watched. "Bad" Even so, sometimes a person can watch a movie just to pass the time (some people do not see such movies as cinema). Movies on which long readings are made are also very instructive - if the metaphors in the movie can be understood or explained. There is a saying I like: "One sees with knowledge." If we know, it becomes easier to see. For this reason, whether a movie is good or bad depends on the knowledge of the viewer. Those who are interested in cinema will read this book without getting bored.
