Save ur money and youth :))
Moisturizing is like saving for retirement, it doesn’T feel necessary when you’re young and when you’re 65 it’s too late...
Freeman Dyson - Why is the Quantum so Mysterious?
"General relativity and quantum mechanics are the two elements of science that most explain what our world is one the whole universe the other the microstructure of reality and everybody tells me that we've got a integrate these two to make sense out of reality and everybody is trying to do that. Is that really necessary? - I dont think so but of course I'm in the minority there as usual."
"We have quantum mechanics which talks about the future which enables us to calculate the probabilities that you want to know when this uranium atom is going to decay. There is no way you can tell. You can calculate the probability. There is one chance in a million that it would have decay by the end of next week or something like that. So that's what quantum mechanics can do and that's all it can do. It's about the future, and probabilities."
"Everything you can say with certainty is classical, and there is also quantum world which is not directly observable but is there, and all you can do with it is to use it for calculating probabilities."
youtube.com/watch?v=X7VxXkW...
Husserl
Consequently no real being is necessary to the being of consciousness itself.
Kant himself is aware that this use of the term departs in a very significant way from previous usages and that is why he is particularly intent on distinguishing the notion of the ‘‘transcendental’’ from the ‘‘transcendent,’’ a distinction that he claims is unique to his new approach to philosophy. What makes it necessary to introduce the distinction and why had it been overlooked in previous philosophy? The answer, I think, has to do the fact that previous philosophers, in particular beginning with the neoplatonic tradition, had brought the two notions into close relationship. They had assumed that ‘‘transcendental knowledge’’ concerned primarily things that ‘‘transcend’’ the realm of individual, finite objects. The traditional ‘‘transcendental
predicates’’ were predicates that apply to anything at all that exists, including and above all God as the unchanging, infinite, and transcendent source of all kinds of beings.
Thomas J. Nenon, Some differences between Kant’s and Husserl’s conceptions of transcendental philosophy
Kant’s strategy with regard to each of the transcendental principles of knowledge is the same. He begins by showing that they exhibit the specific marks of the a priori, namely genuine universality and absolute necessity, at least for a certain realm of knowledge and hence for a certain realm of objects (cf. e.g. B 3 f, also A 1 f). He then asserts that such traits can never be derived from the only source of knowledge that originates from the objects, namely through sense impressions, because sense impressions provide us only with information about objects that is particular and contingent. Hence he concludes that, since all knowledge must be either of subjective or objective origin and these principles cannot come from the objects, they must be of subjective origin.