Akış
Ara
Ne Okusam?
Giriş Yap
Kaydol
Gönderi Oluştur
252 syf.
·
Puan vermedi
Darwin wrote this book in 1872. It's interesting to compare what he wrote about then with what his successor theorists write about today. In contrast to today’s emphasis on universals (e.g., humans are this or not this or that), Darwin notes throughout this book that individuals have a wide variability in physical, emotional, and mental
İnsanın Türeyişi
İnsanın TüreyişiCharles Darwin · Evrensel Basım Yayın · 2015722 okunma
Kendi kalemimden
If Aristotle were alive today, he would likely defend his thoughts on many different subjects. Aristotle was a philosopher who had an interest in a wide range of philosophical, political, and scientific topics. Here are some speculations about what he might defend in different areas: 1. Natural Teleology: Aristotle would argue that there is a
Reklam
The doctrine that pleasure is the highest ethical good lends itself to immediate misunderstanding because of the unfortunate ambiguity of the key term “pleasure.” The Epicureans were purposely misrepresented as sensualists and “high livers” by their philosophical rivals and later by the Christian Fathers. Actually they were rather ascetic and even puritanical both in teaching and in practice, and this fact is borne in on anyone who reads the surviving Epicurean texts sympathetically.
256 syf.
9/10 puan verdi
·
9 günde okudu
Brave New World is a sort of psychological oppression and is a reaction to the mentality of society in developing technology. In the novel, there is a Bokanovsky’s process. They create people in unnatural ways in this process and clone an embryo and categorize them into different classes like Alpha, beta, gamma, etc. There is no individuality because every individual is a clone. So it is pointed out that “We are not our own any more than what we possess is our own. We did not make ourselves; we cannot be supreme over ourselves. We are not our own masters. We are God’s property "(Huxley, 2002, p. 158). Furthermore; soma, like a painkiller is given all individuals to make them relax. We are made to believe that we are happy, and we have everything we want in this world because of the economic policies and capitalist system. However; the real happiness cannot be acquired by consuming, economic or social power. In fact, happiness can be acquired only by freedom. For instance, having freedom and individuality is significant and valuable for John and knowledge is limited in that society. In the book, it is stated that “Knowledge was the highest good, truth the supreme value; all the rest was secondary and subordinate.” (Huxley, 2002, p. 155). Moreover, All human beings are programmed like a machine. The decisions that they take, all the actions that they took are because of soma, hatchery system or feelies. Therefore, we cannot see the concept of individualism. All these things are for the sake of social stability. We can say that “No civilization without social stability. No social stability without individual stability” (Huxley, 2002, p. 31).
Brave New World
Brave New WorldAldous Huxley · Sun Dial Press · 193660bin okunma
Hartmann
There are three fundamental illusions about the value of life. The first illusion is that “Happiness is attainable in the present stage of development of the world” (573). This is an illusion, Hartmann argues, because, for all the reasons just given, happiness in a positive sense is unattainable, and because pain and suffering far outweigh
The true mystic learns that salvation comes not with belief in a supernatural realm that satisfies our desires but in the complete renunciation and eventual extinction of desire; only then do the troubles and torments of life cease to matter to him. It is in this context that we should understand Mainlander’s paradoxical doctrine of the death wish. The inner striving of the will is for death because it is only in death that we find true happiness, which is the highest good for every human being. Such happiness resides in complete tranquillity and peace, which comes only with death, the utter nothingness of annihilation. If Mainlander describes life as a means toward death that is because death promises what life really wants: tranquillity and peace.
mainlanderKitabı okudu
Reklam
The highest good is happiness
Honour, pleasure, intelligence, and the virtues are, he says, not only aimed at as ends in themselves, but are also aimed at for the sake of happiness, whereas happiness is never pursued for the sake of anything else. And because these other things are both ends and means, whereas happiness is never a means to anything else...
Sayfa 41 - Aristotle