Ernesto Laclau Posts
You can find Ernesto Laclau books, Ernesto Laclau quotes and quotes, Ernesto Laclau authors, Ernesto Laclau reviews and reviews on 1000Kitap.
What exists is not an essentially homogeneous entity - the capitalist system – which merely allows for empirical and accidental variations in different historical and geographical contexts. Instead, there are global configurations -historical blocs, in the Gramscian sense -in which the 'ideological', 'economic', 'political' and other elements are inextricably fused and can only be separated for analytical purposes. There is therefore no 'capitalism', but rather different forms of capitalist relations which form part of highly diverse structural complexes.
Sayfa 26 - Verso, 1990.Kitabı okuyacak
In that case, the myth of a separate and definable ‘economic instance' must be abandoned.
Sayfa 25 - Verso, 1990.Kitabı okuyacak
İlk birikimin zorla sağlandığı öncülü kabul edildiğinde:
If, as we have seen, the very antagonism between worker and capitalist is not internal to the relations of production, but is established between the relations of production and an identity external to them, then the modes of relation with that 'outside' cannot be an automatic effect of the logic of accumulation
Sayfa 25 - Verso, 1990.Kitabı okuyacak
This argument on the contextual nature of identities must be maintained without restriction. Claude Lefort, for example, has shown how a category like 'worker' does not designate a suprahistorical essence, since its condition of existence is the separation of the direct producer from the community and the land, and this required the genesis of capitalism.
Sayfa 24 - Verso, 1990.Kitabı okuyacak
What we find, then, is not an interaction or determination between fully constituted areas of the social, but a field of relational semi-identities in which ʻpolitical', 'economic' and ‘ideological' elements will enter into unstable relations of imbrication without ever managing to constitute themselves as separate objects.
Sayfa 24 - Verso, 1990.Kitabı okuyacak
While the first — objectivist - kind of questioning of the social looks for essential characters behind historical specificity, the second moves in the opposite direction; weakening the boundary of essence through the radical contextualization of any object.
Sayfa 22 - Verso, 1990.Kitabı okuyacak