Mertcan Bulak
@MBulak
1183 okur puanı
Ağustos 2020 tarihinde katıldı
Şu anda okuduğu kitap
Although Marx was four years younger, Bakunin was impressed by his intellect, his grasp of political economy and his revolutionary energy. By comparison, he admitted his own socialism was ‘purely instinctive’. But he also recognized that from the beginning they were temperamentally incompatible: Marx accused him of being a ‘sentimental idealist’, while Bakunin found him vain, morose, and devious.
Bazı hikâyeler tam tahmin ettiğin gibi ilerler. Bazılarıysa son sayfada tüm bildiklerini sorgulatır. 🤯
Ters köşeleri seviyorsan, seni sonuna kadar merakta bırakacak 3 kitap önerisini keşfetmeye hazır ol!
Bakunin had a desire to dominate as well as to liberate and recognized that ‘the urge to destroy is also a creative urge’. He called for absolute liberty, attacking all forms of institutionalized authority and hierarchy only to create his own secret vanguard societies and to call for an ‘invisible’ dictatorship.
As for the dictatorship of the proletariat advocated by Marx, Proudhon argued prophetically that it would ensure universal servitude, all-encompassing centralization, the systematic destruction of individual thought, an inquisitorial police, with ‘universal suffrage organized to serve a perpetual sanction to this anonymous tyranny’.
Proudhon was no less prejudiced and dogmatic when it came to race. For all his eloquent celebration of male equality, he maintained that there are ‘badly born and bastard races’ whose inferiority will be underlined by any attempt to educate them. In the forward march of progress they will be wiped out.
To his eternal shame, the so-called father of anarchism sided with the most crude reactionaries by counting himself proudly amongst those men who think ‘a woman knows enough if she knows enough to mend our shirts and cook us a steak’.