John Kennedy
@WhiteHouse
My will: My dear Lisa, a boy will love you, this love is real, appreciate his love, and you love him too. He will call himself a Jupiterian. He will tell you the name of your favorite music. The name of that music is; Chocolate
18.06.1963, 11:43
35 th President of the United States
Harvard University
29 Mayıs 1917
Mart 2025 tarihinde katıldı
I was there today. It was very strange. I saw the park where you and I walked hand in hand and that bench in the park. At that moment, the loud noise around me became inaudible. I could only hear your voice and see you. I felt sad remembering the happy moments. I couldn't call this feeling bad, but I couldn't call it good either.
Reklam
I miss you so much Lisa. I loved you so much. Today I went to a restaurant. I remembered you again. Everyone was chatting and laughing, and I could hear your voice in that restaurant, see your smile. I felt so happy when I held your hands.
In the first phase of the Iranian Army's retaliatory strike, it fired more than 100 ballistic missiles at Israel, resulting in serious damage to the capital Tel Aviv. It seems that the Iranian side has found an opportunity to regroup before Israel after a very difficult day.
The Iranian Army's retaliatory strike is important because it must be demonstrated that, despite the killing of leading generals, the hierarchical structure of the armed forces continues and that it maintains its operational power. Otherwise, a revolt by lower-ranking officers will be inevitable. Back in 1921, in the power vacuum created by the fall of the Qajar dynasty, Reza Khan, supported by the British, entered the capital Tehran with 3-4 thousand troops, seized power and laid the foundation of the Pahlavi dynasty. Of course, it is still too early to talk about a revolt in modern Iran, but it is among the possible scenarios.
Another important aspect of Iran's retaliatory strike is that the attack was limited to Israel. However, for Iran, the shelling of the Gulf could have more serious consequences. It seems that the Iranian leadership still wants to avoid a regional war. Most likely, the Iranian side has one eye on the negotiating table with the United States.
The Israeli side has stated that in the event of counterattacks, Iran's economic infrastructure will be targeted. That is, the scale of the war may increase. But I think it is more likely that the United States will intervene again to defuse tensions...
The “Network Operation” organized by the Ukrainian Army today is a turning point for the war. As a result of drone attacks on at least 4 air bases, a large number of Russian strategic military aircraft have been targeted. Ukrainian sources claim that 40 military aircraft have been shot down. Among the downed aircraft are nuclear bombers. Interestingly, one of the targets, Belaya air base, is located in the city of Irkutsk, 4,000 km from the conflict zone, and the attack on it was carried out from inside Russia. In other words, today’s attacks are a huge fiasco for Russian intelligence and the military.
The cat-and-mouse game that Putin tried to play with Trump has had a very serious outcome. In the past few days, Trump warned Putin with the words “you are playing with fire.” Putin has suffered very heavy losses in the game he wanted to raise his hand. I think Russia is now forced to come to the table, but under more unfavorable conditions.
What if the Russian leadership chooses to escalate instead of stopping? Some sources claim that Russia may respond to Ukraine with nuclear weapons. But a nuclear attack would only complicate the situation, rather than bring Russia closer to its goals. Escalation could lead to a NATO-Russia conflict, which is exactly the scenario Ukraine wants.
There is a heated struggle between the two powerful groups of the Trump administration, the isolationists and the pro-Israeli ones, regarding the Iran issue. It is known that the isolationists, who want to avoid war with the new nuclear deal on the Iran issue, are trying to create a basis for the withdrawal of US troops from the Middle East.
The pro-Israeli group, on the other hand, is increasing the pressure to strike Iran's nuclear facilities and does not want to allow a new nuclear deal. In this regard, the pro-Israeli group has begun to openly criticize and target isolationists such as Vice President Vance, Secretary of Defense Hegseth, and National Security Director Gabbard.
It seems that the Iran issue has created a serious rift in the Trump Administration. Although Trump still supports the isolationist group that supports the nuclear deal on this issue, the pro-Israeli counter-campaign may force Trump to change his position.
In general, the Israeli leadership's insistence on striking Iran raises reasonable doubts. It seems to me that in this scenario, Israel has a more important goal than Iran acquiring nuclear weapons: not to allow the United States to move away from the Middle East. It is clear that strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities will make chain processes in the region inevitable. After the airstrikes, clashes may begin both inside Iran and on its borders, and it is unclear in what direction and for how long these processes will evolve. In short, I think that Israel wants to keep the United States in the region by creating a new quagmire in the Middle East, like Iraq. In this sense, the Iranian issue has a broader geopolitical dimension than nuclear weapons.
Reklam