Gönderi

"'I’ is, therefore, not a unified subject, a fixed identity, or that solid mass covered with layers of superficialities one has gradually to peel off before one can see its true face. ‘I' is, itself, infinite layers. Its complexity can hardly be conveyed through such typographic conventions as I, i, or I/i. (...) Whether I accept it or not, the natures of I, i, you, s/he, We, we, they, and wo/man constantly overlap. They all display a necessary ambivalence, for the line dividing I and Not-I, us and them, or him and her is not (cannot) always (be) as clear as we would like it to be. Despite our desperate, eternal attempt to separate, contain, and mend, categories always leak. Of all the layers that form the open (never finite) totality of ‘I’, which is to be filtered out as superfluous, fake, corrupt, and which is to be called pure, true, real, genuine, original, authentic? Which, indeed, since all interchange, revolving in an endless process?" -Trinh T. Minh-ha (Woman, Native, Other: Writing, Postcoloniality, and Feminism)
·
16 views
Yorum yapabilmeniz için giriş yapmanız gerekmektedir.