Din Üzerine
Vladimir İlyiç LeninDin Üzerine Reviews
You can find Din Üzerine reviews, Din Üzerine book reviews, Din Üzerine ratings on 1000Kitap.Score
8Out of 10
This text has been automatically translated from Turkish. Show Original
I don't know where I saw the book, but I read it because it caught my attention.
In the book, Lenin's views on religion are explained in his own words. Lenin, who expresses his ideas clearly without beating around the bush, harshly criticizes religion. He describes religion as the self-consolation of the proletariat exposed to capitalist oppression, and even Marx's statement that "religion is the opium of societies". He can't help but add his words.
Stating that a socialist must be an atheist or even an atheist, Lenin states that this is one of the basic principles of his party. However, he states here that religion is people's own problem and that the party should not be too oppressive in terms of religion.
Of course, this is not tolerance towards religion; It arises from the attitude of a part of the proletariat, which is not fully enlightened, regarding their religious sensitivity.
A short, clear and concise book. If you are interested in politics, history, socialism, Lenin, or if you have a completely opposite view to this idea like me and want to read it just for curiosity, this is a book I would recommend.
This text has been automatically translated from Turkish. Show Original
On Religion, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
Lenin is a great thinker. The biggest mistake of Lenin and Marxist thinkers in expressing their opinions on religion is that they defend the view that everyone should think like us. I believe that a system in which different beliefs and ideas can live without classification should be a liberal order.
However, I agree with your views on the state having no religion and absolute secularism. The state should treat all religions and all people equally. Lenin argued that people would move away from religion as a result of understanding the Marxist materialist understanding of science. I think it would be a mistake to agree with the idea 100%. The point that distinguishes an idea and a belief is that religion is based on the individual belief system, there is a system that a person believes in. Describing this religion as a nonsense raises the question of the questionability of a belief and dogma.
Lenin says that social-democrats are atheists and that materialist science will save people from the hands of religion, which has become an opium. I think that religion is shaped around people, and the ideas put forward by Lenin on religion can only create a static situation that is far from reality and has regional applicability.
He should say that the defense of the secular order, which includes the freedom of religion and belief that should be implemented today, should be an equality in the direction of the state, and it should be able to create an order where people can even put forward different thought systems and belief systems.
With two different discussions on class conflict and religion, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin explains the party policies and the social democrats' view of religion.
Good reading...
This text has been automatically translated from Turkish. Show Original
On Religion, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
Lenin is a great thinker. The biggest mistake of Lenin and Marxist thinkers in expressing their opinions on religion is that they defend the view that everyone should think like us. I believe that a system in which different beliefs and ideas can live without classification should be a liberal order.
However, I agree with your views on the state having no religion and absolute secularism. The state should treat all religions and all people equally. Lenin argued that people would move away from religion as a result of understanding the Marxist materialist understanding of science. I think it would be a mistake to agree with the idea 100%. The point that distinguishes an idea and a belief is that religion is based on the individual belief system, there is a system that a person believes in. Describing this religion as a nonsense raises the question of the questionability of a belief and dogma.
Lenin says that social-democrats are atheists and that materialist science will save people from the hands of religion, which has become an opium. I think that religion is shaped around people, and the ideas put forward by Lenin on religion are far from reality and can only create a static situation with regional applicability.
He should say that the defense of the secular order, which includes the freedom of religion and belief that should be implemented today, should be an equality in terms of the state, and it should be able to create an order where people can even put forward different thought systems and belief systems.
With two different discussions on class conflict and religion, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin explains the party policies and the social democrats' view of religion.
Good reading...
-Furkan DOLGUN
96 syf.
6/10 puan verdi
Lenin bu kitabinda din uzerine dogru tesbitlerde bulunmus. Bu kitabi okurken bence bir komunist gibi ya da bir dindar gibi kitabi okumak yerine hic bir sey bilmeyen biri gibi lenin'in dunya gorusunu bilmiyormus gibi okumak daha fayda saglayacaktir. Lenin din konusunda din tuccarlarinin halki nasil somurdugunu, dinin dokunulmaz bir seymis gibi tabusunu nasil yiktigini usta bir dille anlatmis.
Ayrica Lenin bir komunist olarak dine ve dindarlara karsi olmadigini bir seyi ne kadar yasaklar engellemeye calisirsan daha ilgi cekici oldugunu anlatmaya calismis. Dinin eger bir tabu olarak gorulmeye devam edildigi surece Lenin'in tabiriyle cahil isci ve koylu kesminin koyun gibi gudulmeye devam edecegini dini yasamak isteyenlerin elbet yasayabilecegini fakat dini kullanip inanmis insanlari somurmenin yanlisligini anlatmis.
Bu gun ulkemizde de din tabularini kullanan din tuccarlarininda fazlaca oldugunu soylemeden gecemeyecegim.
Lenin ayrica bir komunist olarak genclik derneklerine ve genc devrimcilerin uzerlerine dusen gorevlerin neler oldugunu da anlatmis. Komunist nasil olmali komunistim diyip populist entellektullige dusulmemesi gerektigini dile getirmis.
Lenin tolstoy ve maksim gorki'ye de deginmis, elestirisel bir dille dunya goruslerine yaklasmis.
96 syf.
8/10 puan verdi
Guzel, bilgilendirici bir kitap. Din konusundaki tespitler doğru. Ancak hiç bir hiziplesme hareketi bana samimi gelmiyor. Alt kadro üst kadroya göre ideolojilerinde daha samimi. Üst kadro çok daha pragmatist tutum içinde olabiliyor. Kitapta yer yer anarşizmin burjuvazinin ekmeğine yağ sürdüğü şeklindeki söylemler tartışma götürür bir konu. Kendi fraksiyonlarinin hegemonyası adına takiye yapmayı meşru gören doktrinler samimiyetten uzaktır. Keyifli okumalar dilerim.