This text has been automatically translated from Turkish. Show Original
I can say at the outset that it is a work composed of articles by many scientists, philosophers and theologian teachers.
Most of the titles given to the articles were chosen to be seriously intriguing, but some articles were almost always talking about the same thing, even though their authors were different. There were so many repetitions, especially at the Hudus evidence point, that I had to skip it after a while. According to Islamic schools of thought, the book is about creation. The part was very interesting and satisfying. In the second part, the evidence of Bigbang and Hudus is discussed through modern science. What I will specifically mention here is; It is not reasonable for the theologians to consider the Big Bang as evidence for the existence of Allah - except for the theory of causality. Because the non-existence understood by science and the non-existence understood by the theologians are not the same thing. The scientific information in this section of the book also shows us where current research is.
In the last section, articles written on the Theory of Evolution are waiting for you. The fact that an article was written by a biologist also increased the value of the work. In general, it is emphasized in these articles that there is no problem between the Quran and Evolution. Statements are also made on the assumption that there is neither rejection nor acceptance of the Quran. Enis Doko also has two different unifying theories on the theory of Evolution and creation in Islamic thought.
In short, I got enough out of the book, except for the Hudus evidence section. Blessings to the pen of the copyright holders...
