Tunca Arslan Reviews
You can find Tunca Arslan reviews, Tunca Arslan book reviews, Tunca Arslan ratings on 1000Kitap.122 syf.
9/10 puan verdi
This text has been automatically translated from Turkish. Show Original
Do you think that the Zeitgeist documentary is a production prepared entirely by volunteers and to raise people's awareness, with no ulterior motives?
Zeitgeist is a very successful and convincing documentary, but when it is not watched from a critical perspective and the information presented to us is not checked, it causes one to think that they
This text has been automatically translated from Turkish. Show Original
It is a book that shows with evidence how the Zeitgeist documentary distorts the facts and how, while claiming to open people's eyes, it actually creates a new fog over people's eyes.
In the book, it is stated that Jesus of Nazareth, who appeared in the first part of the documentary, did not actually live.
and the criticism of the section in which it was explained that the features attributed to him were taken from previous mythologies was very good. In this part of the documentary, it is revealed with evidence how the facts are distorted.
I think Tunca Arslan's review is the best part of the book. Tunca Arslan says that Zeitgeist is a documentary that repeats the view that war against imperialism (for example, wars of independence) is futile by replacing the concept of imperialism with a few omnipotent capitalists, and that enlightenment will not come with a Zeitgeist CD.
To tell the truth, the documentary impressed me a lot at first. Zeitgeist is a very successful and convincing documentary on this subject. When not viewed with a critical eye, it causes the person to think they know everything.
The only thing I disagree with in the book is that conspiracy theories are portrayed as a completely negative concept. This is especially evident in Haluk Hepkon's article. I think it is wrong to put all conspiracy theories in the same category. Some conspiracy theories are actually based on logical arguments. These may not fully reflect the facts, but I think they are important in terms of revealing doubts and concerns. These theories can be useful if they are critically evaluated through the filter of logic.
I recommend this book, which reminds us how important it is to critically evaluate the things we read and watch and to check the information presented to us.
This text has been automatically translated from Turkish. Show Original
Film critic Tunca Arslan, in this book, lists 35 "bad" movies released between 1981 and 2008. It's about a Turkish movie. The author, who evaluates the films mostly in terms of script, character and logical errors, also included in the book the criticisms of other critics that appeared at the time of the films' release. The book has a sarcastic, humorous language. Even if they are bad, some movies arouse curiosity and make you want to watch them. It would be interesting to watch some of the films that I have watched and liked in the past, along with the opinions in this book, but I think it will not be possible to access the relevant films. The definition of good movie or bad movie may vary from person to person. There are very different perspectives on cinema as an art. For example, some care about the script, some care about the images, some care about the characters, and some care about the message of the film. Today "garbage" There are also many movies described as. Interestingly, "garbage" Some of the films described as can break box office records. Films that comply with the principles of cinema can only reach a few thousand viewers. Perhaps what is important here is the purpose for which the film is watched. "Bad" Even so, sometimes a person can watch a movie just to pass the time (some people do not see such movies as cinema). Movies on which long readings are made are also very instructive - if the metaphors in the movie can be understood or explained. There is a saying I like: "One sees with knowledge." If we know, it becomes easier to see. For this reason, whether a movie is good or bad depends on the knowledge of the viewer. Those who are interested in cinema will read this book without getting bored.
1980 Sonrası Türk Sineması'nda Akla Zarar FilmlerTunca Arslan · Kırmızı Kedi Yayınevi · 20099 okunma
Zeitgeist belgeselini izledim daha sora erol hocamın tüm kitaplarımina aşinayıö dikkatimi çekti okudum. Erol hocama katılmadığım yerler var. Yani belgeseli bu kadar eleştirmek bana çok mantıklı gelmediki belgeselde jiddu krishnamurti gibi bilgelerde var