pelin
@absint
Şu anda okuduğu kitaplar
When [60 studies] taken in toto, Kahn is correct -there's no clear consensus. But Schillinger added one variable -food company sponsorship. Lo and behold, of the twenty-six studies sponsored by food companies, all twenty-six showed no effect. Of the thirty-four studies that were independently funded, thirty-three showed a clear relationship between sugar consumption, obesity, and diabetes -meaning the food industry has polluted the data.
Reklam
In 2017, Francisco was debating adding warning labels to cans of soda akin to packs of cigarettes, a campaign in which I was the scientific expert and reviewer of promotional materials. Richard Kahn, in opposition, coauthored an expert report on behalf of the American Beverage Association. In that report he wrote, "There is no scientific consensus that added sugar, including added sugar in beverages, plays a unique role in the development of obesity and diabetes." Could it be because Kahn, during his tenure at the ADA, signed a three-year $1.5 million sponsorship deal with Cadbury-Schweppes, the world's largest confectioner?
Everyone thinks that first you gain weight, and then you get sick. Yet, 80 percent of the time, it's actually the other way around.
Screw prevention, which takes time, infrastructure, and investment. Now, you could achieve cure. There's a pill for that.
In 1980, 30 percent of the adult US population, or fifty-two million people, were affected by at least one chronic condition. Today it's 60 percent, or 145 million people. The percentage of those affected by two or more chronic diseases has grown from 16 percent to 42 percent.
Reklam