Court decisions are usually categorized as interlocutory decisions (ara karar) and final decisions (nihai karar). This distinction is made mainly to determine the appealability of a decision. Interlocutory decisions, which are decisions made in order to resume the action as opposed to terminating it, are not appealable in principle as opposed to final decisions. In principle, the court may reverse its interlocutory decision at any time.
Final decisions of the court are generally categorized into three categories, which are (1) procedural final decisions (or dismissal of the action on procedural grounds), (2) the judgment (hüküm) (ruling on the merits) and (3) decisions declaring that the subject matter of the action has perished (therefore there is no need to render a judgment). Procedural final decisions are the dismissal of the action on account of procedural errors. These decisions do not resolve the dispute; therefore, a new action may be filed again. Judgments, on the other hand, resolve the dispute and therefore constitute res judicata, upon which they become unappealable. If a party files another action identical to the previous one, the court must dismiss the action on account of a res judicata on the matter.
Sayfa 188Kitabı okudu
·
7 görüntüleme
Bu yorum görüntülenemiyor
Yorum yapabilmeniz için giriş yapmanız gerekmektedir.