In fact, the need to be near someone special is so important that the brain has a biological mechanism specifically responsible for creating and regulating our connection with our attachment figures (parents, children, and romantic partners). This mechanism, called the attachment system, consists of emotions and behaviors that ensure that we remain safe and protected by staying close to our loved ones. The mechanism explains why a child parted from his or her mother becomes frantic, searches wildly, or cries uncontrollably until he or she reestablishes contact with her. These reactions are coined protest behavior, and we all still exhibit them as grown-ups. In prehistoric times, being close to a partner was a matter of life and death, and our attachment system developed to treat such proximity as an absolute necessity.
Sayfa 16
Hayat Bilimi
Ne ilginçtir ki insanlar her türlü meselede eğitim ve eğitmen ihtiyacının farkındalar ve iyi kötü özenli bir çalışma içerisindeler ama hayat bilimi ile hiç ilgilenmiyor ve onu anlamak için hiç çaba sarf etmiyorlar.
PİERRE NİCOLE (Treatise on the Necessity of Not Trusting to Chance)
Sayfa 11Kitabı okudu
foreign policy making process
In other words, official public discourse created the conditions for a ''torture-sustaining reality'' in the US by using language that dehumanized suspected and made the public -despite minority opposition- willing to accept the necessity to abuse them. Without assessing the power of this discourse, it is hard to explain how the US could adopt a set of practices so at odds with its moral values.
Sayfa 112 - pearson new international edition
Bence bu kitabın en iyi alıntısı
"This is the excellent foppery of the world, that, when we are sick in fortune-often the surfeit of our own behavior-we make guilty of our disasters the sun, the moon, and the stars . . . as if we were villains on necessity;
fools by heavenly compulsion; knaves, thieves, and treachers by spherical predominance; drunkards, liars, and adulterers by an enforc'd obedience of planetary influence; and all that we are evil in, by a divine thrusting-on!"
Sayfa 388Kitabı okudu
Oh, tell me,who was it first announced, who was it first proclaimed, that man only does nasty things because he does not know his own interests; and that if he were enlightened, if his eyes were opened to his real normal interests, man would at once cease to do nasty things, would at once become good and noble because, being enlightened and understanding his real advantage, he would see his own advantage in the good and nothing else, and we all know that not one man can, consciously, act against his own interests, consequently, so to say, through necessity, he would begin doing good? Oh, the babe! Oh, the pure, innocent child! Why, in the first place,when in all these thousands of years has there been a time when man has acted only from his own interest? What is to be done with the millions of facts that bear witness that men, CONSCIOUSLY, that is fully understanding their real interests, have left them in the background and have rushed headlong on another path, to meet peril and danger, compelled to this course by nobody and by nothing, but, as it were, simply disliking the beaten track, and have obstinately, wilfully, struck out another difficult,absurd way, seeking it almost in the darkness.
If, as I believe, the ends of men are many, and not all of them are in principle compatible with each other, then the possibility of conflict - and of tragedy - can never wholly be eliminated from human life, either personal or social. The necessity of choosing between absolute claims is then an inescapable characteristic of the human condition. This gives its value to freedom as Acton conceived of it - as an end in itself, and not as a temporary need, arising out of our confused notions and irrational and disordered lives, a predicament which a panacea could one day put right.
"Communism ... is the genuine resolution of the antagonism between man and nature and between man and man; it is the true resolution of the conflict between existence and essence, objectification and selfaffirmation, freedom and necessity, individual and species. It is the riddle of history solved and knows itself as this solution."
Sayfa 37 - Marx
There is no necessity for a society to develop or adopt the institutions that are best for economic growth or the welfare of its citizens, because other institutions may be even better for those who control politics and political institutions. The powerful and the rest of society will often disagree about which set of institutions should remain in place and which ones should be changed.
It is true that all forms of life — by necessity and by natural design — consume one another to live, but they do not intentionally bring about another's extinction, systematically deprive other species of their source of food, or create factions and wars. The same cannot be said for human beings.
Sayfa 24Kitabı okudu
Ömrümüzü yedin be Şekerpare
Footloose and fancy free (ipsiz sapsız, başına buyruk),
From the bottom of your heart (yüreğinizin en derinlerinden, bütün yüreğinizle),
To be left high and dry (kılma halel gelmemek),
A piece of cake (kolay lokma),
To refuse to budge an inch (kılını kıpırdatmamak),
Tongue-tied (dili tutulmak),
A tower of strength (kaya gibi sağlam),
Hoodwinked
Sayfa 52 - Ulan bunlar nasıl deyimler himminaaa
