reading the blind owl from perspective of nietzsche
Puan vermedi
Sadeq Hedayat is one of my favorite author in the literary world. The Blind Owl that introduced me to Sadeq Hedayat many years ago and it has entered my list of the best. Hedayat's masterpiece The Blind Owl attracted me with the very first lines, and caused me to experience a kind of hysteria with the last page of the book.
Coming to the content of the book; the hero is a heavily depressed man who earn his income with the paintings. He takes alcohol and opium continuously to make himself numb and stop thinking. One day as he walks to the kitchen to deliver wine to his uncle, he sees the elderly man and the stunningly beautiful girl through a hole in his wall, which causes his lonely existence to change. After this sight, he begins to think her all day hysterically. One night, he finds her waiting at the door of his home. After this strange encounter, he searches for anything to offer her then goes to get a bottle of wine for her. When he brings the wine, he thinks that the girl is asleep, and drops a sip in her mouth. He did, however, realize that she had passed away.He wants to ignore the cold of death with the warmth of his body, but later on realizes that it's not working. Then, he henhe decides to bury the girl by dismembering her and packing her pieces into a suitcase since he thinks she has given up on life and given her soul to him. The old man he saw with the girl, the carriage driver who came to pick her up, his uncle who came to visit, and even himself in some parts of the book, are actually all the same person transformed according to his descriptions. All the characters transform into each other and repeat themselves like eternal recurrence, creating a metaphoric effect. Always different faces, but same suffering.
According to
Selamlar ️
3 kitaplık bir serinin ilk kitabıyla karşınızdayım. Kitabın türü Gerilim. Yoruma başlamadan önce şunu söylemeliyim kitap bir harika ama yeni kitap okumaya baslayan arkadaşlara tavsiye etmiyorum, uzun gelebilir. 784 sayfa gelelim kitaba,nerden başlasam baş karakterimiz AMY in doğumu ile başlıyor. AMY 8 yaşına geldiğinde annesi bir cinayet işliyor ve kızını rahibelere bırakıp kaçıyor. O sırada Ordunun "NUH PROJESİ" kod adlı deneysel bir ilaç terapistinin üçüncü deneme safhası için on ila yirmi idam mahkumuna ihtiyacı vardı. Mahkumların rızaları karşılığında cezaları şartlı tahliyesiz ömür boyu hapse çevrilecekti. Sadece aralarında bir çocuk seçilmişti, oda kimsesiz kalan Amy'di. Deneyler sonrasında işler ters gidip denekler kapalı oldukları yerden kaçarlar. Bu denekler kan ile beslenen vahsi yırtıcılara dönüşmüşlerdir.(Viral,Vampir) Isırdıkları insanları da dönüştürüyorlardır. Herşey kontrolden çıkar ve tüm dünyaya yayılırlar ve insan ırkı tükenmeye başlamıştır. Ordu sadece çocukları toplayarak güvenli bir sığnağa yerleştirirler. Sadece bu çocuklar ve cok az insan hayatta kalmayı başarırlar. Hikayemiz 100 yıl sonrasıyla devam eder. O sığnaktaki çocuklar büyür evlenir çocukları olur hatta torunları bile olur. Hiçbir zaman dışarı çıkmazlar. Sadece görevli kişiler gün ışığında çıkarak gerekli erzak ve yiyecekleri toplayarak sığnağa geri dönerler. Bu kısımlar bana çok sevdiğim The Walking Dead evrenini hatırlattı Neyse Amy 100 yıl sonra bu sığnağa erişir 8 yaşında görünen 100 yaşında bir viral'dir. Ama kan ile beslenmez. İnsanlar onu iceri alırken virallerin saldırısına uğrarlar ve bir çok kişi kaybederler. Kızın tuhaf oluşu herkesi huzursuz eder ve onu orda istemezler. Daha sonra birkaç kişi ile birlikte sığnaktan AMY korumak için kaçarlar, AMY nin bir tedavi
Reklam
John Barth is the most important postmodernist novelist and his works of art fiction and reality somehow is complicated. It becomes difficult to decide which one is real and which one is fiction. Blurring and uncertainty is so immense that sometimes it is problematic to understand what is happening and what is going on this story. In the story we have suspicions and questions. All the time, nothing is accepted, and we have a sceptical reading. Every concern and everything are sceptical, and we should not forget that the question is very important. Linda Hutcheon talks about self-reflexivity. Do nothing that we are pieces of reality. In fact, we are fictional. They all the time try to make us aware of being fictional. This progress is self-reflexivity of postmodernist works of art. Another word, it shows us through metafiction, through inflectional references, through parody and pastiche.
The author used mostly the techniques of metafiction. The author often comments on the narration and sometimes criticizes creation. While narrating the story, he starts to tell very unusual thing, or he starts to give some certain clues related to the techniques. So, all these things help you understand that be aware. This is not a sort of real thing. Do not get lost in the magical story. The other is playful language. Immitations of the language is one of the problems that postmodernist author criticizes. They try to challenge the limitations through playing with the languages. Pronunciations and the spelling of these words are somehow distorted. It shows “mock “this is the motto of postmodernism. Parody, fragmented narration, open ended closure, intertextual references, and uncertainty are the other concepts or techniques used in the novel. Open ended closure is sometimes subverted
