113 syf.
·
Puan vermedi
This is no Little Prince, that's for sure. You must kill the fox, burn the rose, murder the businessman, if any of them tries to take control over your princedom. There's no time to be nice! There's only time to seem to be nice. At the end of the day, it is better to be feared than loved, if you can't be both. Nevertheless, keep in mind chapter 23. The Prince was written in the 16th century and a couple of its ideas are too contemporary. It is a major treatise that influenced several political leaders throughout history. Machiavelli is widely regarded as the father of modern politics by taking away any trace of theology and morality from his works. (That is something no one has ever said before.) I should have read it long ago, but everything has its time, I suppose. So, there are a lot of concepts that should just stay in the book and a few which you may apply to everyday circumstances. It delivers what you are waiting for, if you want to know how to have and keep power to yourself, no matter the head you are crushing, and all that using a fairly straightforward language. It is a short book and easy to understand, even though the notion of achieving glory, power and survival, regardless of how immoral you have to be... it is not difficult to comprehend; that we get. Cruelty, wickedness, immorality; all those things apparently needed to achieve greatness, all of them printed long ago in the form of a little book, just like that... From a twisted point of view, sometimes, it is almost a bit funny. It was an excellent read.
The Prince
The PrinceNiccolo Machiavelli · 201714,9bin okunma
Birikme ve sıçrama düşüncesi Hegel'i akla getiriyor ama burada sıçrama, yeni olanın başlangıcını değil, eski olanın meyvesini meydana getiriyor. Büyük insanı içinde bulunduğu çağ değil, geçmiş olan çağ ortaya çıkarıyor. 44 My Idea of Genius.—Great men, like periods of greatness, are explosives storing up immense energy; historically and
Reklam
Buddhism differed radically from Shinto in a number of ways. First, it was a “revealed” religion. It had a definite founder in the person of Shakyamuni Siddharta, a prince of the Sakya clan in what is now Nepal. Second, it was concerned with personal morality, salvation, and the afterlife. Third, it was a world religion, in the sense that its message was deliberately aimed at all humankind, not at a specific nation or culture.
Perhaps we should forget about morality, and think about myth, fantasy, appetite, and desire – everything we can safely enjoy on stage, in fiction, on screen; everything that has to be excluded or at least tempered in the rational everyday lives we try to lead ‘outside’. We could add to this Freud’s argument that what appeals to us about great characters on stage is precisely their enormity. All the sex and violence they commit – all their ‘errors’ – act out for us the desires and fears we have to repress. Of course tragic characters are primitive, barbaric, monstrous. They represent all that we have had to overcome in the cause of culture and civilization.
Sayfa 51
Genuine morality is doing what is right regardless of what we may be told; religious morality is doing what we are told. Religion’s power gives us strong reasons to do what we’re told.
c.s.lewis the moral law is from god evrensel ahlak yasaları vardır: "differed as regards what people you ought to be unselfish to—whether it was only your own family, or your fellow country-men, or everyone. But they have always agreed that you ought not to put yourself first. Selfishness has never been admired. Men have differed as to
Reklam
39 öğeden 11 ile 20 arasındakiler gösteriliyor.