Akış
Ara
Ne Okusam?
Giriş Yap
Kaydol

Keith Faulks

Keith FaulksPolitical Sociology yazarı
Yazar
0.0/10
0 Kişi
1
Okunma
0
Beğeni
683
Görüntülenme

Hakkında

Tam adı:
Dr. Keith Faulks
Unvan:
Felsefe Doktoru, Yazar
Doğum:
10 Haziran 1967

Okurlar

1 okur okudu.
Reklam

Sözler ve Alıntılar

Tümünü Gör
Because of an imbalance between rights and obligations, it is argued that many Western countries are suffering from an identity crisis, as the glue that holds the fabric of civil society together is weakened because of an overemphasis upon rights.
Sayfa 136
If the political system was as open as pluralists argued, how could the dominance of political positions by white, middle-class males be explained?
Sayfa 45
Reklam
Elite theory is clearly under theorized and tells us a little about the state-civil society relationship. (...) Elitists failed to explain the relationship between different kinds of power, and in particular the link between politics and economics is left largely unexplored.
Sayfa 42
Turner, like Mann and Marshall, overlooks the fact that citizenship is a gendered concept. This is particularly problematic for Turner's treatment of the public-private divide in the various historical examples he discusses. Although much of the originality of Turner's argument rests upon this distinction, he makes no reference to the vast feminist literature on the inequalities that are perpetuated by a differentiation between the public realm as political and the private sphere as a ‘heaven from a heartless world’.
Sayfa 132
Schumpeter argues that political rule is always exercised by a minority, and that in complex societies participatory democracy, where the masses play a direct and constant role in decision making, is impossible. There is no one dominant elite in liberal society, but instead that exists a dynamic between organized minorities. (...) Democracy is seen, not as an end in itself, but is a method by which elites can be selected by the masses. (...) Schumpeter feels that the most democratic institution in society is the market and therefore political institutions should be based on this model: just as capitalists compete for customers, politicians should compete for votes.
Sayfa 43
Henüz kayıt yok

Yorumlar ve İncelemeler

Tümünü Gör
Reklam
Henüz kayıt yok