Titans
Titans, together! Çocukluğumdan beri beni çizgi roman dünyasına ait kılan ilk bağlamı sorduklarında hep Titans derdim. Onların bir parçası olmak; Dick ve Wally ile kanka, Donna Troy’un platonik aşığı ya da ekibin romantik ruhu olma arzusu… Daima keyifle okuyacağım Titans öykülerini.
Bu ise kültleşmiş bir hikaye olan Judas Contract, Slade’in ne denli karanlık bir insan olduğunu önünüze serecek.
A Critical Review of Humankind
Rutger Bregman’s book Humankind is one of the books that questions negative ideas about human nature and makes readers think. For many years, many people believed that humans are naturally selfish, bad, and only care about themselves. However, Bregman does not agree with this idea. According to him, human nature is not as dark as people think. Instead, people are more willing to help each other, understand others’ feelings, and do good things. In the book, the author supports these ideas with many examples from wars, psychology experiments, history, and biology. One of the best parts of the book is that it gives hope about humanity. Still, when I finished the book, I did not only feel admiration. On one side, I was happy to read it because it made me think differently. On the other side, some of the author’s ideas felt too optimistic to me. Because of this, the book was both interesting and questionable for me.
One of the strongest parts of the book is that it makes people question ideas about human nature that many accept without thinking. Today, we often see violence, murder, wars, and fights on television, social media, and in the news. After some time, people start to believe that the world is full of bad people. At this point, Bregman asks an important question: If humans were really bad by nature, how could societies survive for so many years? A big part of human history was shaped by helping each other, working together, and surviving together. From this side, the writer’s ideas are important and meaningful.
His ideas against the belief that humans are naturally wild are especially interesting. Today, when someone behaves badly, people sometimes say, “Did you grow up in a cave?” However, Bregman says that hunter-gatherer societies were not as violent as many
Spoiler
Yani o kadar doldum ki hangi birini desem gerçekten bilmiyorum. Serinin en güzeli kitabı denilen ve 9 puan alan bu kitap beni gerçekten hayal kırıklığına uğrattı. Ben ilk kitabını daha çok sevmiştim en azından yarısında romance okusak da bir şeyler olmuştu ve son kısmı kaynaklı kitabı kurtarmıştı ilk kitap denilip devam edilebilecek şekildeydi ama bu kadar Rhys hayranlığının sebebini anlayamadım açıkçası.
Kitap 3 kısımdan oluşuyor. İlk kısımda Tamlin den nefret ettirme çabası ve Tamlin in yaptığı her şeyin zıttını yapan Rhys e iteleme çabası hakim. Çok yapay bulduğum bir tercih ettirme şekli yani Tamlin tamam saçma şeyler yapıyor da o kadar nefretler içinde yanılıp tutuşulacak bir karakter değil bence. Sonuçta 2 ay öncesine kadar aşkından öldüğü hayatını ortaya koyduğu bir karakterdi. Neyse Rhys tabiki Feyre ye daha özgürlük tanıyan karakterini ortaya koyması için alan açan bir karakter.
İkinci kısımda tamamen Feyre ve Rhys ilişkisi zaten. Ben ilk kısımlarda bir yerde sanırım Kazan dan bahsediliyor böylece evren genişliyor, Feyre Rhys tarafından teste tabi tutuluyor Dokumacının evine gidiyoruz yok Kemik koleksiyoncusuna gidiyoruz buraları aşırı heyecanlı ve severek okudum ve ilerisi için de hyplandım açıkçası. Ama sanırım kitabın en güzel kısımları oralardı. Mesela kralın kazanı bulmasından bahsediliyor keşke bunları görebilseydik, Amren kitabın şifresini çözmeye çalışıyor, Azriel ve Cassian mucizevi bir şekilde girilen Hybern Kralı nın sarayına gidip geliyor oraları öğreniyor nasıl gireriz çıkarız dakikasına kadar plan kuruyor ama biz bunları görmek yerine Rhys ve Feyre okuyoruz ve bu olayların hepsi deus ex machina, mucizevi bir şekilde aniden çözülüveriyor. Durum böyle olunca tabi okur evrenden kopuyor ve mantık hataları çok daha fazla gözüne batmaya başlıyor.
Fransızlar neden insan gibi konuşmaz ki?
I had already read The Adventures of Tom Sawyer before, and Huckleberry Finn was one of the characters in that book. Because of that, I became curious about him and wanted to read Adventures of Huckleberry Finn as well.
After I started reading, I realized that I really enjoyed the humorous style of the book. The language and the dialogues made the story more interesting and enjoyable for me.
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was published in 1884 and is considered one of the major works of American Realism. Unlike Romantic literature, Twain focuses on ordinary people, realistic language, and social problems. Through Huck’s journey, the novel reflects important issues of 19th-century American society such as racism, slavery, violence, religious hypocrisy, and social inequality. Twain also satirizes romantic adventure stories, especially through the character of Tom Sawyer.
The novel follows Huck Finn, a young boy who escapes from his abusive father and travels along the Mississippi River with Jim, an escaped enslaved man. During their journey, they meet many different people and experience both humorous and serious situations. Through these adventures, Huck begins to question society’s values, racism, religion, and morality.
Huck also starts to test the religious teachings of Miss Watson and Widow Douglas. He does not fully accept everything that society and religion teach him, and throughout the novel he tries to understand what is morally right by himself.
Mark Twain mainly criticizes romanticism and unrealistic adventure stories. Tom tries to behave like the characters in books, while Huck thinks more realistically and questions these ideas. Through this contrast, Twain makes fun of romantic ideals that are disconnected from real life. Whether everything we learn
Reading this felt less like a traditional narrative and more like an intimate documentary. By offering the dual perspectives of both authors, the book provides a balanced and realistic look at "cohabitation." It explores how two distinct personalities—with different habits and tastes—can create a harmonious sanctuary together.
There was a beautiful sense of familiarity in their daily struggles and triumphs, which made the reading experience feel incredibly heartwarming. It wasn't just about friendship; it was about the logistics of sharing a life, from splitting chores to managing their "maximalist vs. minimalist" conflict. For anyone who values independence but fears loneliness, this book serves as a perfect blueprint. I’d give it a solid 9/10—a refreshing, modern take on what "home" can truly mean.
The Wonderful Wizard of Oz by L. Frank Baum tells the story of Dorothy, a young girl who lives in Kansas and is suddenly carried away by a cyclone to the magical land of Oz. After her house accidentally kills the Wicked Witch of the East, Dorothy learns she must travel to the Emerald City to ask the Wizard of Oz for help returning home. Along the way, she meets the Scarecrow, who believes he lacks a brain; the Tin Woodman, who longs for a heart; and the Cowardly Lion, who wishes for courage. The group travels together, facing various challenges before finally reaching the Wizard. He promises to help them only if they defeat the Wicked Witch of the West, which Dorothy ultimately does. However, when they return, the Wizard is revealed to be an ordinary man using illusions. Despite this, he gives Dorothy’s companions tokens that help them recognize they already possess the qualities they desired. In the end, Dorothy learns she can return home using the magical power of her silver shoes, realizing that her greatest wish has been within her reach all along.
From a literary perspective, the novel explores themes of self-discovery, identity, and the importance of inner qualities over external appearances. Each of Dorothy’s companions symbolizes a human trait "intelligence, compassion, and courage" and their journeys reveal that these qualities are not granted by others but already exist within them. This idea reflects a central message of the novel: people often underestimate themselves and seek validation from external sources instead of trusting their own abilities. The story also examines the contrast between illusion and reality, particularly through the character of the Wizard, who appears powerful but is ultimately just an ordinary man. This suggests a subtle criticism
