Akış
Ara
Ne Okusam?
Giriş Yap
Kaydol
Gönderi Oluştur

Stuart Rachels

Stuart RachelsThe Elements of Moral Philosophy yazarı
Yazar
10.0/10
1 Kişi
3
Okunma
0
Beğeni
249
Görüntülenme

Hakkında

Eğitim: Emory Üniversitesi. Filozof, eski satranç oyuncusu.
Unvan:
Filozof
Doğum:
Alabama, ABD, 26 Eylül 1969

Okurlar

3 okur okudu.
1 okur okuyor.
1 okur okuyacak.
Reklam

Sözler ve Alıntılar

Tümünü Gör
What is morality?
We are discussing no small matter, but how we ought to live. Socrates, in Plato’s REPUBLIC (ca. 390 bc)
Moral reasonig
When we feel strongly about an issue, it is tempting to assume that we simply know what the truth is, without even having to consider the arguments. Unfortunately, however, we cannot rely on our feelings, no matter how powerful they may be. Our feelings may be irrational; they may be the products of prejudice, selfishness, or cultural conditioning.
Reklam
...criticizing animal experiments is too easy for most of us. We may feel self-righteous or superior because we do not do such research ourselves. All of us, however, are involved in cruelty when we eat meat. The facts about meat production are more disturbing than any facts about animal experimentation.
Sayfa 109
Same sex relations
...the purpose of our genitals is to procreate: Sex is for making babies. It may be argued, then, that gay sex is unnatural because it is sexual activity that is divorced from its natural purpose. This seems to express what many people have in mind when they say that homosexuality is unnatural. However, if gay sex were condemned for this reason, then a number of other, widely accepted practices would also have to be condemned: masturbation, oral sex, sex using condoms, and even sex by women during pregnancy or after menopause. These practices would be just as “unnatural” (and, presumably, just as bad) as gay sex. But there is no reason to accept any of these conclusions, because this whole way of reasoning is faulty. It rests on the assumption that it is wrong to use parts of one’s body for anything other than their natural purposes. Why should we accept that assumption? The “purpose” of the eyes is to see; is it therefore wrong to use one’s eyes to flirt or to give a signal?
Sayfa 45
if someone says that something is morally wrong, he does need reasons, and if his reasons are legitimate, then other people should accept their force. By the same logic, if he has no good reason for what he says, then he is simply making noise and may be ignored.
Sayfa 11
Henüz kayıt yok

Yorumlar ve İncelemeler

Tümünü Gör
Reklam
Henüz kayıt yok