*The thing that touches me the most is this story exiled
It was written on time and in fact that Dostoevsky committed theft from place to place and even wrote them.
To speak from the naivety of one's language and psychological analysis
There is no need for a writer at extremes anyway.
With the memory of another theft of a book
It begins when it is spoken. So the usual polarizations exist again. No matter what, at some point, the subject is again morality, conscience or good and bad again...
Another point is that Stockholm syndrome is also impressive. When the character first met the honest thief, he saw how he hated it as if he was killing, but later he was tied to him with very strong ties, which is the subtle point.
That's the conclusion we need to draw, so that this should be
I'm thinking. Sometimes we can make mistakes, the important thing is that we can do after that mistake, we can face ourselves, learn, and the most important thing is that we can always empathize and not be dogmatic to something. A book that is a lesson, fluent, and can end immediately, good reading :)