Critique of Pure Reason
Immanuel KantSözler ve Alıntılar
Thus Kant concludes that “understanding and reason, that is to say, the faculty of cognizing distinctly and the faculty of syllogistic reasoning, are not different
fundamental faculties. Both consist in the capacity to judge”.
Sayfa 25Kitabı okudu
Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe the more often and more enduringly reflection is occupied with them: the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me”..
Sayfa 1Kitabı okudu
To have knowledge of the events of an objective world beyond one’s own consciousness is to subsume those events under causal laws, and to have knowledge of causal laws is to conceive of those laws as themselves part of a system of laws that, if not actually created by God, can nevertheless only be conceived by us as if they had been created by an intelligence like but more powerful than ours .
Sayfa 26Kitabı okudu
and the idea of God guides us in regarding the world as if it were the product of a highest intelligence,..
Sayfa 16Kitabı okudu
"All changes are bound to time and are inconceivable without time. If changes
are real, then time is real, whatever it may be. If time is unreal, then no change
can be real. I think, though, that even an idealist must grant at least that changes really exist and occur in his representations, for example, their beginning and ending. Thus time cannot be regarded as something unreal."
Sayfa 36Kitabı okudu
.., all modern thinkers are children of Kant, whether they are happy or bitter about their paternity:)
Sayfa 20Kitabı okudu