Akış
Ara
Ne Okusam?
Giriş Yap
Kaydol

Critique of Pure Reason

Immanuel Kant

Critique of Pure Reason Gönderileri

Critique of Pure Reason kitaplarını, Critique of Pure Reason sözleri ve alıntılarını, Critique of Pure Reason yazarlarını, Critique of Pure Reason yorumları ve incelemelerini 1000Kitap'ta bulabilirsiniz.
796 syf.
·
Puan vermedi
·
25 günde okudu
Kant'ın eserlerini hangi probleme ilişkin yazdığını, kimleri eleştirdiği ve bunlara yönelik verdiği cevapların özetlendiği sistematik bir eser. "Neyi Bilebilirim?" sorusundan başlayıp "Ne yapmalıyım?" ve son olarak "Neyi Ümit Edebilirim?" sorularıyla Saf Aklın Kritiğini temel alıp diğer eserlerinin de neden yazdığının ve evrensel bir ahlak yasasına nasıl ulaşılacağını özetlenmeye çalışıldığı bir eserdir. Kısaca Trancendental felsefenin yani Kant felsefesinin özetlendiği giriş niteliğinde bir eser. Kant'ın genel çerçevesini anlamak istiyorsanız yani neden geleneksel metafiziği eleştirdi ve yeni bilimsel bir metafizik anlayışı kurmaya çalıştığını merak ediyorsanız iyi bir eser. Keyifli okumlar.
Critique of Pure Reason
Critique of Pure ReasonImmanuel Kant · ‎Cambridge University Press · 19995 okunma
"Thoughts without content are empty, intuitions without concepts are blind”
Reklam
For several reasons I cannot convince myself that time is something merely subjective. Succession is after all at least a necessary condition of the representations that finite minds have... . Since we have to grant the reality of succession in a representing creature and in its alternations, why not also in the sensible objects, which are the models and prototypes of representations in the world?
"All changes are bound to time and are inconceivable without time. If changes are real, then time is real, whatever it may be. If time is unreal, then no change can be real. I think, though, that even an idealist must grant at least that changes really exist and occur in his representations, for example, their beginning and ending. Thus time cannot be regarded as something unreal."
...appear to us, but not how they actually are in themselves.
Reklam
To have knowledge of the events of an objective world beyond one’s own consciousness is to subsume those events under causal laws, and to have knowledge of causal laws is to conceive of those laws as themselves part of a system of laws that, if not actually created by God, can nevertheless only be conceived by us as if they had been created by an intelligence like but more powerful than ours .
Thus Kant concludes that “understanding and reason, that is to say, the faculty of cognizing distinctly and the faculty of syllogistic reasoning, are not different fundamental faculties. Both consist in the capacity to judge”.
.., all modern thinkers are children of Kant, whether they are happy or bitter about their paternity:)
Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe the more often and more enduringly reflection is occupied with them: the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me”..
11 öğeden 1 ile 10 arasındakiler gösteriliyor.