En Beğenilen Political Sociology Gönderileri
En Beğenilen Political Sociology kitaplarını, en beğenilen Political Sociology sözleri ve alıntılarını, en beğenilen Political Sociology yazarlarını, en beğenilen Political Sociology yorumları ve incelemelerini 1000Kitap'ta bulabilirsiniz.
Because of an imbalance between rights and obligations, it is argued that many Western countries are suffering from an identity crisis, as the glue that holds the fabric of civil society together is weakened because of an overemphasis upon rights.
Sayfa 136
If the political system was as open as pluralists argued, how could the dominance of political positions by white, middle-class males be explained?
Sayfa 45
Elite theory is clearly under theorized and tells us a little about the state-civil society relationship. (...) Elitists failed to explain the relationship between different kinds of power, and in particular the link between politics and economics is left largely unexplored.
Sayfa 42
Turner, like Mann and Marshall, overlooks the fact that citizenship is a gendered concept. This is particularly problematic for Turner's treatment of the public-private divide in the various historical examples he discusses. Although much of the originality of Turner's argument rests upon this distinction, he makes no reference to the vast feminist literature on the inequalities that are perpetuated by a differentiation between the public realm as political and the private sphere as a ‘heaven from a heartless world’.
Sayfa 132
Marxists reject the abstract individualism of liberalism and instead understand human behavior in its societal context.
Sayfa 34
Schumpeter argues that political rule is always exercised by a minority, and that in complex societies participatory democracy, where the masses play a direct and constant role in decision making, is impossible. There is no one dominant elite in liberal society, but instead that exists a dynamic between organized minorities. (...) Democracy is seen, not as an end in itself, but is a method by which elites can be selected by the masses. (...) Schumpeter feels that the most democratic institution in society is the market and therefore political institutions should be based on this model: just as capitalists compete for customers, politicians should compete for votes.
Sayfa 43
Karl Marx
Without a revolutionary change, the inequalities of civil society would always serve to dilute the impact of citizenship. Individuals would remain alienated from themselves and their community, because for the greater part of their life they were workers and not citizens.
Sayfa 127
The state and civil society are in an interdependent power relationship. (...) Ideas such as the state always serves dominant economic interests or that the state can never act in the interests of class must be abandoned in favour of a more nuanced approach that focuses on specific cases.
Sayfa 49
The state is a historical rather than an inevitable phenomenon.
Sayfa 31
If political sociology is to explain why some political interests within society are more successfully promoted than others, then it must develop a more sophisticated theory of power.
Sayfa 11