Ernesto Laclau Gönderileri
Ernesto Laclau kitaplarını, Ernesto Laclau sözleri ve alıntılarını, Ernesto Laclau yazarlarını, Ernesto Laclau yorumları ve incelemelerini 1000Kitap'ta bulabilirsiniz.
There can be nothing contingent in the latter if there is identity between the rational and the real.
Sayfa 20 - Verso, 1990.Kitabı okuyor
To ground the contingent being on its conditions of existence is thus to refer it to a foundation or origin which maintain an infinite distance from it. The infinite nature of that distance is the condition of contingency as such. In response to this, the alternative exists of referring finite beings back to conditions of existence which are necessary, but which are conceived not in terms of an infinite distance from them, but racher as the ground for a self-generating and self-regulating totality, From Spinoza to Marx, this is the line of modern thought In this case, however, contingency is eliminated and radically absorbed by the necessary. It is in this sense that Hegel proclaims the identity between the rational and the real.
Sayfa 20 - Verso, 1990.Kitabı okuyor
To assert that something is radically contingent, and that its essence does not imply its existence, therefore amounts to saying that the conditions of existence of an entity are exterior to it. Only in the case of a strictly necessary being does a perfect coincidence between essence and existence occur.
Sayfa 19 - Verso, 1990.Kitabı okuyor
Our thesis is that antagonism has a revelatory function, in that it shows the ultimately contingent nature of all objectivity.
Sayfa 18 - Verso, 1990.Kitabı okuyor
With antagonism, however, it is an entirely different matter: it is not my identity which is expressed, but the impossibility of its constitution.
Sayfa 18 - Verso, 1990.(Preface)Kitabı okuyor
The Hegelian conception of contradiction subsumed within it both social antagonisms and the processes of natural change. This was possible insofar as contradiction was an internal moment of the concept, the rationality of the real was the rationality of the system, with any 'outside' excluded by definition. In our conception of antagonism, on the other hand, we are faced with a 'constitutive outside'. It is an ‘outside' which blocks the identity of the 'inside' (and is, nonetheless, the prerequisite for its constitution at the same time). With antagonism, denial does not originate from the 'inside' of identity itself but, in its most radical sense, from outside; it is thus pure facticity which cannot be referred back to any underlying rationality.
Sayfa 17 - Verso, 1990.(Preface)Kitabı okuyor
(…) to affirm its [class struggle] preeminence would have questioning the ultimate coherence and rationality of history.
Sayfa 17 - Verso, 1990.(Preface)Kitabı okuyor
A concept such as the ‘cunning of reason' in Hegel can only assert the rationality of the real at the expense of reducing antagonism, negativity, to an appearance through which a higher form of rationality and positivity works
Sayfa 16 - Verso, 1990.(Preface)Kitabı okuyor
(…) relations of production are not intrinsically antagonistic.
Sayfa 16 - Verso, 1990.(Preface)Kitabı okuyor
“Eşitliğin, politik dünyaya girdiği kadar, sonunda diğer alanlara da girmeyeceğine inanmak olanaksızdır. İnsanları tek bir
konuda ebediyen eşitsiz, diğer konularda ise eşit olarak düşünmek mümkün değildir; belli bir anda, bütün konularda eşit hale geleceklerdir. "
