Reading witcher in english is fascinating. Even though its translated directly from Polish, English sometimes flattens the raw, gritty Slavic wit, but the dark atmosphere still punches through. I love how this book tears down pretty fairy tales. It shows a magical world ruined by ugly human realities such as injustice, racism, and violence. It proves that no matter the universe, human nature always brings the same disgusting problems. Since I’ve played all the games, I didn't have to build this world from scratch. I felt like I was returning home, totally immersed from page one. Plus, every character is so distinct you instantly adopt them. Dandelion, especially, is brilliant, his dramatic bard energy perfectly balances the grim reality. The core of the book for me is Geralt. He acts like a heartless mutant who only kills for coin, forcing himself to believe he has no feelings because society expects him to be cold. But underneath, he is incredibly soft hearted. I related to him deeply. People often call me emotionless too. But I know how much I actually care. When it matters, sometimes I act way more thoughtful and genuinely considerate than the people who constantly brag about how sensitive they are. Like Geralt, being guarded doesn't mean you don't feel. Some dislike that this is just a collection of scattered short stories, but I think it’s the perfect, low pressure gateway into the universe. It’s a fun, easy read that makes you feel both the darkness of the world and the hidden warmth of its hero.
The Darkest Night, aforizmalardan oluşan, alt yapısında nihilizm, felsefe ve varoluşçuk barındıran bir aydınlanma kitabı. Aydınlanma dememin nedeni, birçok cümlede kendinizi sorgulamanızı sağlayacak fikirler barındırması. Hani rahatsız edici kitaplar deriz ya, işte öyle birşey. Okuyup da geçilecek değil, uzun uzun düşündürecek türden.
Genel kabul gören kurallar ve tabular yer yer reddediliyor. İnsanın düşündüklerinden ibaret olduğu ve belki de kimsenin göründüğü gibi olmadığı yine Cem beyin aforizmalarının arasında sık sık karşımıza çıkıyor. Dozunda ve yerinde bir kullanım ile ünlü düşünürlerin alıntılarına da yer verilmiş.
Hayat denilen bu yolda belki de zaman zaman kendimizi sorgulamaya ve farklı düşünce yapıları ile karşılaşmaya ihtiyacımız var. Çokça altını çizdim, bazı yerlerde Cem beyin keskin edebi zekasını da hissettim.
Kitap şimdilik İngilizce basım. Ama okunması rahat, Türkçesi çıkana kadar merak edenlere söylemiş olayım.
Türü sevenlere öneriyorum.
Keyifli okumalar dilerim...
English
The Darkest Night is an enlightenment book composed of aphorisms, underlying nihilism, philosophy, and existentialism. I say enlightenment because many sentences contain ideas that will make you question yourself. You know how we say "disturbing books"? Well, it's one of those. It's not the kind you read and move on from; it will make you think deeply.
Generally accepted rules and taboos are occasionally challenged. The idea that a person is defined by their thoughts, and perhaps that no one is what they seem, frequently appears in Mr. Cem's aphorisms. Quotations from famous thinkers are also included, used appropriately and in moderation.
Perhaps, on this journey called life, we sometimes need to question ourselves and encounter different ways of thinking. I underlined
Bazı hikâyeler tam tahmin ettiğin gibi ilerler. Bazılarıysa son sayfada tüm bildiklerini sorgulatır. 🤯
Ters köşeleri seviyorsan, seni sonuna kadar merakta bırakacak 3 kitap önerisini keşfetmeye hazır ol!
A Critical Review of Humankind
Rutger Bregman’s book Humankind is one of the books that questions negative ideas about human nature and makes readers think. For many years, many people believed that humans are naturally selfish, bad, and only care about themselves. However, Bregman does not agree with this idea. According to him, human nature is not as dark as people think. Instead, people are more willing to help each other, understand others’ feelings, and do good things. In the book, the author supports these ideas with many examples from wars, psychology experiments, history, and biology. One of the best parts of the book is that it gives hope about humanity. Still, when I finished the book, I did not only feel admiration. On one side, I was happy to read it because it made me think differently. On the other side, some of the author’s ideas felt too optimistic to me. Because of this, the book was both interesting and questionable for me.
One of the strongest parts of the book is that it makes people question ideas about human nature that many accept without thinking. Today, we often see violence, murder, wars, and fights on television, social media, and in the news. After some time, people start to believe that the world is full of bad people. At this point, Bregman asks an important question: If humans were really bad by nature, how could societies survive for so many years? A big part of human history was shaped by helping each other, working together, and surviving together. From this side, the writer’s ideas are important and meaningful.
His ideas against the belief that humans are naturally wild are especially interesting. Today, when someone behaves badly, people sometimes say, “Did you grow up in a cave?” However, Bregman says that hunter-gatherer societies were not as violent as many
spoiler!
Dead Poets Society is a deeply emotional story that reminds us that life is not only about success or discipline, but also about poetry, romance, love, and passion. One of the most heartbreaking parts of the book is Neil’s tragic death, which changes the entire atmosphere of the story. In the film adaptation of the book, whenever the word “death” is mentioned, the camera often focuses on Neil’s face, creating a powerful example of foreshadowing. This detail makes the ending even more emotional and unforgettable, while also emphasizing how destructive social pressure can be on young people’s dreams.
Tehlikeli şeyleri dekor olarak kullanan Wattpad estetiği.
Puan vermedi
Darkrom kitaplarını incelemeye başladım ve zamanında en popüler olanlardan biriyle başlamak istedim. Her kitaptan da en problematik alıntıyı seçiyorum, bu kitabın en problematik alıntısı da son da yer alacak.----
Kitap, yüzeyde etkili bir mafia romance formülüne sahip: yasak arzu, aile baskısı, güçlü erkek karakter, “iyi kız” imajının çatlaması ve sürekli yükselen cinsel gerilim. Danielle Lori’nin kitabı okunabilir kılan şeyi inkâr etmek haksızlık olur; Nico ve Elena arasındaki bakışmalar, yaklaşmalar, kesilen konuşmalar ve “olmaması gereken” çekim hissi türün istediği bağımlılık etkisini veriyor. Ancak kitabın problemi de tam burada başlıyor: Roman, güçlü olduğu şeyi —cinsel gerilimi— ahlaki ve psikolojik tutarlılığın önüne koyuyor.
Nico Russo, klasik possessive mafia hero olarak yazılmış. Tehlikeli, kontrolcü, kıskanç, dominant ve duygularını şiddetle ifade eden bir erkek. Fakat roman onun karanlığını gerçek bir karakter problemi olarak incelemek yerine çoğu zaman çekicilik unsuru haline getiriyor. Nico’nun Elena üzerindeki sahiplenici dili, tehditleri ve kıyafet/beden üzerinden kurduğu kontrol, metinde yeterince sorgulanmadığı için “romantik yoğunluk” gibi sunuluyor. “Because you were mine” cümlesi bunun en açık örneği. Bu söz, ilk okumada tutkulu bir aşk ilanı gibi durabilir; fakat aslında kadını özne değil, mülk olarak konumlandırır. Nico, Elena’yı koruduğunu değil, ona sahip olduğunu söyler. Aradaki fark, kitabın bütün problematik erkeklik modelini açığa çıkarır.
Elena’nın karakterizasyonu da bu yapıyı güçlendirir. Roman onu “Sweet Abelli” olarak kurar: güzel, uyumlu, nazik, aile içinde doğru cevabı veren, mafia dünyasının iyi kızı. Bu imajın kırılması ilginç bir karakter gelişimi yaratabilirdi. Elena kendi arzularını, öfkesini ve ahlaki sınırlarını
Jonathan Livingston Seagull by Richard Bach may appear to be a simple story about a bird, but it develops into a layered allegory about individuality, freedom, and spiritual growth. Jonathan, unlike the rest of his flock, is not satisfied with living only to eat and survive. He becomes obsessed with flight not as a tool, but as a way of reaching perfection and understanding something greater about existence itself.
This desire isolates him. The flock, representing conformity and societal limitation, rejects him for refusing to follow its narrow rules. His exile symbolizes the cost of individuality: those who question norms are often cast out. Yet this separation is also what allows Jonathan to grow. Freed from the expectations of others, he pushes himself further and eventually reaches a higher level of existence, where he learns that true perfection is not just physical but spiritual.
Flight becomes the central symbol of the story. It represents self-discovery, discipline, and transcendence. The sky stands for infinite possibility, suggesting that limits are not absolute but largely self-imposed. Jonathan’s journey reflects the pursuit of self-actualization, the idea that fulfillment comes from realizing one’s full potential.
At the same time, the story strongly echoes Biblical patterns, especially those associated with Jesus Christ. Jonathan is rejected by his community, ascends to a higher plane of understanding, and returns as a teacher. He gathers followers and teaches them that they, too, can overcome their limitations. Like Christ, he emphasizes growth, belief, and a deeper understanding of existence.
However, Bach reinterprets these ideas in a more philosophical and less doctrinal way. There is no focus on sin or divine judgment. Instead, the central
