Pornography: Men Possessing Women
Andrea DworkinEn Beğenilen Pornography: Men Possessing Women Sözleri ve Alıntıları
En Beğenilen Pornography: Men Possessing Women sözleri ve alıntılarını, en beğenilen Pornography: Men Possessing Women kitap alıntılarını, etkileyici sözleri 1000Kitap'ta bulabilirsiniz.
Women are reared, and often forced, to conform to the specific requirements of ideal beauty, whatever they are at any given time. From foot-binding to waist binding to breast binding, ideal beauty often requires deforming of the natural body. From clitoridectomy to breast enlargement or reduction to surgically altered noses, ideal beauty often requires mutilation of the natural body. From hair dyeing to face painting to necessary ornamentation (for instance, high-heeled shoes), ideal beauty often requires distortion or denial of the natural body. Ranging from idiocy to atrocity, any and all strategies are employed so that the natural female body will fit the male idea of ideal female beauty.
He has obscured the fact that there is no male conception of sex without force as the essential dynamic.
The function of beauty in the realm of the so-called erotic was further elucidated by Bataille when he wrote: “Beauty is desired in order that it may be befouled; not for its own sake, but for the joy brought by the certainty of profaning it.” Beauty, then, consistently has meaning in the sphere of female death or violation. An object is always destroyed in the end by its use when it is used to the fullest and enough; and in the realm of female beauty, the final value of the object is precisely to be found in its cruel or deadly destruction.
The importance of pornography to the human male is counted in gold; danger to the female is counted in feathers.
Society’s general willingness to do anything necessary to protect boys and men from male sexual aggression is testimony to the value of a male life. Society’s general refusal to do anything meaningful to protect women and girls from male sexual aggression is testimony to the worthlessness of a female life. A male life must be protected for its own sake. A female life warrants protection only when the female belongs to a male, as wife, daughter, mistress, whore; it is the owner who has a right to have his rights over his females protected from other men. A female’s bodily integrity or well-being is not protected because of the value of the woman as a human being in her own right.
Will there be someone there to implore the audience to help her escape the pornography—law or no law, constitution or no constitution; will the audience understand that as long as the pornography of her exists she is a captive of it, a fugitive from it? Will the audience be willing to fight for her freedom by fighting against the pornography of her, because, as Linda Marchiano said of Deep Throat, “every time someone watches that film, they are watching me being raped”? Will the audience understand that she is standing in for those who didn’t get away; will the audience understand that those who didn’t get away were someone—each one was someone? Will the audience understand what stepping down from the page or out of the film cost her—what it took for her to survive, for her to escape, for her to dare to speak now about what happened to her then?