A Critical Review of Humankind
Rutger Bregman’s book Humankind is one of the books that questions negative ideas about human nature and makes readers think. For many years, many people believed that humans are naturally selfish, bad, and only care about themselves. However, Bregman does not agree with this idea. According to him, human nature is not as dark as people think. Instead, people are more willing to help each other, understand others’ feelings, and do good things. In the book, the author supports these ideas with many examples from wars, psychology experiments, history, and biology. One of the best parts of the book is that it gives hope about humanity. Still, when I finished the book, I did not only feel admiration. On one side, I was happy to read it because it made me think differently. On the other side, some of the author’s ideas felt too optimistic to me. Because of this, the book was both interesting and questionable for me.
One of the strongest parts of the book is that it makes people question ideas about human nature that many accept without thinking. Today, we often see violence, murder, wars, and fights on television, social media, and in the news. After some time, people start to believe that the world is full of bad people. At this point, Bregman asks an important question: If humans were really bad by nature, how could societies survive for so many years? A big part of human history was shaped by helping each other, working together, and surviving together. From this side, the writer’s ideas are important and meaningful.
His ideas against the belief that humans are naturally wild are especially interesting. Today, when someone behaves badly, people sometimes say, “Did you grow up in a cave?” However, Bregman says that hunter-gatherer societies were not as violent as many
Fransızlar neden insan gibi konuşmaz ki?
I had already read The Adventures of Tom Sawyer before, and Huckleberry Finn was one of the characters in that book. Because of that, I became curious about him and wanted to read Adventures of Huckleberry Finn as well.
After I started reading, I realized that I really enjoyed the humorous style of the book. The language and the dialogues made the story more interesting and enjoyable for me.
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was published in 1884 and is considered one of the major works of American Realism. Unlike Romantic literature, Twain focuses on ordinary people, realistic language, and social problems. Through Huck’s journey, the novel reflects important issues of 19th-century American society such as racism, slavery, violence, religious hypocrisy, and social inequality. Twain also satirizes romantic adventure stories, especially through the character of Tom Sawyer.
The novel follows Huck Finn, a young boy who escapes from his abusive father and travels along the Mississippi River with Jim, an escaped enslaved man. During their journey, they meet many different people and experience both humorous and serious situations. Through these adventures, Huck begins to question society’s values, racism, religion, and morality.
Huck also starts to test the religious teachings of Miss Watson and Widow Douglas. He does not fully accept everything that society and religion teach him, and throughout the novel he tries to understand what is morally right by himself.
Mark Twain mainly criticizes romanticism and unrealistic adventure stories. Tom tries to behave like the characters in books, while Huck thinks more realistically and questions these ideas. Through this contrast, Twain makes fun of romantic ideals that are disconnected from real life. Whether everything we learn
Hangi tür kitapları seviyorsun?
🔎 Polisiye
💕 Romantik
🚀 Bilim Kurgu
🏰 Fantastik
📖 Klasik
🧠 Kişisel Gelişim
🏛️ Tarih
😱 Gerilim
5/10
Yaşanan deprem ve sel felaketlerinden önce, buraya kesin bir dönüş yapmıştım. Hayat sağ olsun, bana ikisini de yaşattığı için, ancak şimdi kendimi tekrar bulabildim, ondan da şüpheliyim ya, neyse!
Sally Rooney, “Normal İnsanlar”la tanıştığım, çok sevdiğim bir kalem olmuştu ilk romanıyla. Hulu tarafından kitabın diziye aktarıldığı dijital bir işi e çok çok sevdiğim belirteyim. “Arkadaşlarla Sohbetler”, bırakın Normal İnsanlar kadar, basit ve yavan bir tar bırakıyor ağızda. Cinsel yönelimlerin bakış açılarını, sevmenin ve aşık olmanın kesin çizgilerinin olmadığını, bunun şeffaf sınırlara sahip olduğunu güzel anlattığına katılsam da, ağızdaki o kekremsi yavan tat çıkmıyor aklınızdan.
Normal İnsanlar’dan sonra okursanız, beğenmem şansınız olmadığını düşünüyorum veya kıyaslama yapmadan okumanız gerektiğini düşünüyorum. Rooney’nin Dublin şehrinin güzelliğini yansıtışı, orada öğrenci olmak ve part-time bir işte çalışmak falan… özendirdiği durumlar… Son kararı size bırakmakla birlikte, çok beklentiniz olmadan, vakit geçirmek adına okuyunuz. Kitapla kalın!
Aslında çoğu kişinin okumaktan ziyade uyarlama filmiyle tanıdığı kitap Dövüş Kulübü. Kitap yeraltı edebiyatının en gözde ve en tanınmış eserlerinden biri olarak bolca kara mizah ve argo içeriyor öncelikle bunu belirteyim.
Kitap beklediğimin aksine güçlü bir kapitalizm eleştirisi. Anlatıcı, bir şirkette çalışan yüksek kademeli bir eleman; Ikea mobilyalarıyla döşeli evinde aslında özgür olmadığını tüketim toplumunun bir parçasına dönüştüğünü fark ediyor. Maddi olarak kendisini güvence altına almış olsa da manevi yönden açlık da çeken bir adam. Daha sonra akşamları katılmaya başladığı terapi seanslarında da Marla Singer ile tanışıyor. Ancak kırılma noktasını oluşturan tanışma bu değil. Asıl tanışma tam bu sıralarda Tyler Durden isimli part time sinema makinistliği, lüks otel garsonluğu, son derece karizmatik, etkileyici bir adam. Bu yeni başlayan arkadaşlıkla beraber bir gün anlatının evi yanıyor ve o da Tyler Durden ile yaşamaya başlıyor. Sonrasında ise bu ikili Dövüş Kulübü'nü kuruyorlar. Gizli bu kulüple birlikte anlatıcı farklı bir özgürlük keşfediyor.
Bu kurdukları gizli kulüpte, kulüp üyeleri dövüşerek hayatın stresini atıp bastırdıkları kişiliklerini burada ortaya çıkarırlar. Ve bu fikir o kadar başarılı oluyor ki bir noktadan sonra farklı şehirlerde farklı şubeleri açılıyor. Tabi ki gizlilik devam ediyor. Ama bir noktada karmaşa oluşmaya başlıyor. Özgürlük fikriyle ortaya çıkan kulüp kısa süre sonra bambaşka bir kaosa sebep oluyor.
Her yeraltı kitabında olduğu gibi bu kitapta da, insanın acımazlığı, pisliği okuyucunun yüzüne vuruluyor. Kitap felsefi yönlere de fazlasıyla sahip. Kitabı okurken hayatımızı düşündüğümüzde, aslında hepimiz tüketim toplumu içerisinde hepimiz aynı örüntüleri tekrarlayan, aynı hiçliği hisseden, aynı doyumsuzluk ve depresyonla savaşan
Léon l’Africain is one of those rare historical novels that feels both intimate and epic at the same time. Written as a fictional memoir, the book tells the story of Hasan al-Wazzan, a real historical figure who later became known in Europe as Leo Africanus. He was born in Granada at the time of its fall, traveled across North Africa and the Middle East, was captured by pirates, and eventually lived in Rome. His life alone sounds like fiction but it isn’t.
That’s part of what makes this novel so powerful: it’s based on a real person who truly moved between civilizations during a time of huge political and religious change. Through his eyes, we witness the fall of Muslim Spain, the cultural richness of Fez, the tensions within the Islamic world, and the Renaissance atmosphere of Rome. Instead of presenting history as a dry list of dates and events, Maalouf lets us experience it through emotions, relationships, and personal dilemmas.
The novel explores themes of identity, exile, belonging, and cultural hybridity. Hasan doesn’t fully belong anywhere, not in Granada after its fall, not entirely in Fez, and not even in Rome where he adapts to survive. His shifting identity raises questions that still feel relevant today: Are we defined by religion? By nationality? By language? Or are we something more fluid?
What I really appreciate about this book is how smoothly history is blended into the narrative. You learn about political struggles, trade routes, religious conflicts, and intellectual life almost without noticing that you’re “studying.” If someone doesn’t enjoy reading history books, this novel is a perfect alternative. It teaches history through story. The facts are there, but they’re alive attached to characters you care about.
Maalouf’s writing style is
Puan vermedi
“Russia! Russia! What is the incomprehensible, mysterious force that draws me to you? Why does your mournful song, carried along your whole length and breadth from sea to sea, each and re-echo incessantly in my ears? What is there in that song? What is it that calls, and sobs, and clutches at my heart? What are those sounds that caress me so poignantly, that go straight to my soul and twine about my heart? Russia! What do you want from me? What is that mysterious, hidden bond between us?”
How the affectione love for this gray country is reflected, Gogol himself is encountered by the harsh dilemma of whether to love or to complain aboout the country itself. He reveals the deep corruption of the russian society including the bureaucratic absurdity that is shown by the officials. Although the city is corrupted, he cannot hold himself without expressing the mysterious, hidden bond between him and his hometown. Even though he is complaining and creating a social satire for Russia, at the same time he accepts that he is part of this system as well, as being a russian. He admits that he has some 'Russia' in him, symbolizng both the corruption and the sweet-sound home. As well as Chichikov, the writer himself is facing the conflict caused by 'being a part of something' whether the whole thing is a negative or a positive statement.
