Akış
Ara
Ne Okusam?
Giriş Yap
Kaydol
Gönderi Oluştur

Ali Rıza Güngen

Ali Rıza GüngenFinansallaşma, Borç Krizi ve Çöküş yazarı
Yazar
Çevirmen
8.0/10
4 Kişi
18
Okunma
2
Beğeni
779
Görüntülenme

Ali Rıza Güngen Sözleri ve Alıntıları

Ali Rıza Güngen sözleri ve alıntılarını, Ali Rıza Güngen kitap alıntılarını, Ali Rıza Güngen en etkileyici cümleleri ve paragragları 1000Kitap'ta bulabilirsiniz.
Turkish neoliberalism carries all the general characteristics of an attack on popular and working class aspirations by capital and by neoliberal advocates. Yet neoliberalism is also differentiated by the historical specificity of capitalism in Turkey, its class- and socially divided society, and its integration into the world market.
Sayfa 108Kitabı okudu
Financial transformation within a liberal environment cannot be administered under a ‘minimal’ state.
Reklam
In Turkey, a key aspect of the post-crisis reproduction of neoliberalism and financialization is centralized political control and the real separation of the financial apparatus from popular and working class interests.
Sayfa 121Kitabı okudu
The state-led restructuring contributed not only to the increased concentration in the sector, but also to the increased penetration of the financial sector into the everyday lives of the Turkish people. The Turkish banking sector has benefited from higher rates of profit.
Sayfa 163Kitabı okudu
The role of the state is not to be conceived merely as a transmission belt from the global economy to the national economy. Nor should the relative autonomy of the capitalist state imply a conception of the state being the locus of a coherent and rational policy external to capital. Rather the struggles among social forces located within each social formation should also be taken into account.
Construction in general, and housing in particular, have always been very important sectors of the Turkish economy, for channeling private sector investment, as well as for employment creation.
Reklam
The social and class power of finance capital, re-institutionalized by the process of state restructuring and internalized within the state apparatus, suppresses alternatives to capitalist financial imperatives. According to the hegemonic point of view in Turkey, financial stability relied on this re-institutionalization, also named as a further step in the implementation of structural reforms. It also meant subordination to neoliberal discipline, and suppressing threats (such as the collective rights of labour and its organizational power) to the economic and political power of financial capital. The neoliberal emergence of market finance in Turkey proceeds along the lines promoted by AKP cadres, but it has not led to stable growth and the fair distribution of wealth. The increased prospects for securitization and new mechanisms mainly benefit financial capital and it is questionable whether policymakers will reap their expected benefits, such as increased savings and more developed financial markets with higher liquidity and better opportunities for investors.
Sayfa 180Kitabı okudu
The first phase of financial liberalization in Turkey did not produce an outcome that has been highlighted as a defining feature of financialization (cf. Lapavitsas 2009, 2011). That is to say, commercial banks have not become more distant from industrial and commercial capital, notwithstanding the objectives reflected in the wording of World Bank’s SALs and Decree no.70 to the contrary. The Turkish experience does not provide evidence for the detachment and/or the severance of financial from productive capital (cf. Wood 2007). Indeed, it emerges as a distinct modality of financialization that would not entail such a detachment, but rather the blurring of frontiers between financial and non-financial activities within the non-financial corporations too (cf. Serfati 2011; Türel 2009: 154), as the evolving process of financial liberalization revealed in its successive phases.
Neoliberalism has tended to increase the power and autonomy of specific, often finance-based, and increasingly centralized state authorities: treasuries, ministries of the economy, central banks, and the political executives. Such transformation is deeply political and entails inherently unequal social and class-based dimensions.
Sayfa 108Kitabı okudu
The integration into the global economy has rarely been either perceived or presented as an end in itself; that is, until there would be a significant shift or emphasis from 1980 onwards. In that respect, the dependence of the Turkish economy on foreign savings has been a constant feature of Republican history, as well as being a source of tension and contention both within the Turkish power bloc, and with its relations with foreign creditors at different intervals.
Reklam
Gölge bankacılık sistemi, herhangi bir zorunlu karşılık yasasına tabii olmadığı için, kaldıraç oranı da daha yüksektir.
Notabene YayınlarıKitabı okudu
1990'lı yıllarda talebi arttırmak için faiz oranları düşürüldü. Faizlerin düşük olduğu ortamda borsa yüksek getiri vaat ediyordu. Böylece şirketlerin hisseleri arttı. Bir yandan firmalara yeni yatırımlar için muazzam miktarda taze fon akışı gerçekleşmiş oldu, diğer yandan krediye ulaşma olanakları çok kolaylaştı.
Notabene YayınlarıKitabı okudu
Modern ekonomi, sonsuz bir büyüme tasavvuru üzerine kuruludur. Bu tasavvurun arkasında firma kârlarının sürekli olacağı fantezisi yatar. Kapitalizm öncesinde pazar için üretim değil, ihtiyaç için üretim esastır.
Notabene YayınlarıKitabı okudu