This importance of community, and the irrelevance of belief, extends as well to the nastier effects of religion. The psychologist Jeremy Ginges and his colleagues found a strong relationship between religiosity and support for suicide bombing among Palestinian Muslims, and, again, the key factor was religious community, not religious belief: mosque attendance predicted support for suicide attacks; frequency of prayer did not. Among Indonesian Muslims, Mexican Catholics, British Protestants, Russian Orthodox in Russia, Israeli Jews, and Indian Hindus, frequency of religious attendance (but again, not frequency of prayer) predicts responses to questions such as “I blame people of other religions for much of the trouble in this world.” It might seem perverse to conclude that religious beliefs are toothless when it comes to morality. Take suicide bombing. Even if one’s attitude is best predicted by religious attendance and not religious belief, it does seem reasonable to conclude, as Richard Dawkins does, that someone who believes that God wants them to kill infidels is going to be a lot more enthusiastic about killing infidels than someone who doesn’t believe in God in the first place. More generally, religions make explicit moral claims, about abortion, homosexuality, duties to the poor, masturbation, and just about everything else. Surely this would have an effect on the psychologies of their followers?