What Is Patriotism?
by Emma Goldman
1908
San Francisco, California
Men and Women:
What is patriotism? Is it love of one's birthplace, the place of childhood's recollections and hopes, dreams and aspirations? Is it the place where, in childlike naivete, we would watch the passing clouds, and wonder why we, too, could not float so swiftly?
Alain Delonun Romy Schneider için onun ölümünden sonra yazdığı mektup
“I watch you sleep. I’m with you, by your bedside. You’re wearing a long black tunic and red embroidery on the bodice. These are flowers, I think, but I do not look at them. I will say goodbye, the longest farewell, my Puppelé. That’s how I called you. It meant “little doll” in German. I do not watch the flowers, but your face and I think you’re
Musa Furber'in sorusu
"Discussion question for fiqh nerds:
Maxim 1: "الضَّرُورِيَّاتُ تُبِيحُ الْمَحْظُورَاتِ"
Maxim 2: "الرُّخَصُ لَا تُنَاطُ بِالْمَعَاصِي"
Apply these two maxims to the following scenario:
Ahmed orders pork dumplings & wine.
A dumpling gets lodged in his throat.
Nothing else is
“I've always loathed the necessity of sleep. Like death, it puts even the most powerful men on their backs.”
-Frank Underwood
Kant’s strategy with regard to each of the transcendental principles of knowledge is the same. He begins by showing that they exhibit the specific marks of the a priori, namely genuine universality and absolute necessity, at least for a certain realm of knowledge and hence for a certain realm of objects (cf. e.g. B 3 f, also A 1 f). He then asserts that such traits can never be derived from the only source of knowledge that originates from the objects, namely through sense impressions, because sense impressions provide us only with information about objects that is particular and contingent. Hence he concludes that, since all knowledge must be either of subjective or objective origin and these principles cannot come from the objects, they must be of subjective origin.
Kant’s strategy with regard to each of the transcendental principles of knowledge is the same. He begins by showing that they exhibit the specific marks of the a priori, namely genuine universality and absolute necessity, at least for a certain realm of knowledge and hence for a certain realm of objects (cf. e.g. B 3 f, also A 1 f). He then
“The smell of her hair, the taste of her mouth, the feeling of her skin seemed to have got inside him, or into the air all round him. She had become a physical necessity.”