Here it may be useful to note that the recent discussion about
universalism has blended three questions: the distinction between descriptive and analytic statements (both of which can simultaneously be true); the validity of statements reflecting competing interests (all of which may be equally valid and equally
self-interested); and critical rationality as the basis of scholarly
communication.
“At last I resorted to the greatest and most infallible means of subduing a woman's heart—a means that never fails anyone and works unfailingly on every woman without exception. It is the well-known method of flattery. There is nothing in the world more difficult than sincerity, and nothing easier than flattery. If there is even one hundredth part of a false note in sincerity, discord immediately arises, followed by scandal. But if everything in flattery is false to the very last note, it is still received and listened to with pleasure. And no matter how crude the flattery may be, at least half of it will certainly seem true.”
-Note to self, Batman: Green Lantern can handle anything. What are your powers anyway? You can’t fly.
-No.
-Super-strength
-No.
-Hold on a second… You’re not just some guy in a bat costume aren’t you? ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING ME?!